This Article will explore the intriguing and unique case of It also raised novel questions regardingĪuthorship under the Copyright Act and how creativity is protected in the

Intriguing questions about standing for nonhuman entities. Resulting “Monkey Selfies” and who could sue to protect those rights, raised Of the “Top Ten Most Ridiculous Lawsuits of 2015.” The case has been called “curious,” Īnd simply “absurd.” But this case, dealing with who owned the Chamber Institute for Legal Reform’s survey

Slater, Įven took first place for the U.S. Naruto’s case raised intriguing legal questions and stole the The first legal declaration that an animal owned property. If successful, the lawsuit would have been Managed to jumpstart a legal campaign to assert animals’ rights to sue inįederal court and protect their interests in their created works. With a single snap, a “curious male crestedīlack macaque” named Naruto not only captured an iconic photograph, but also Little did he realize the enormous legal battle that would result from that simpleĪct. When David Slater left his camera unattended in Indonesia,

Naruto animal i have become